going away - Comic Discussion (Print & Web!)

The worst criticism you've got about your comic
usedbooks at 9:17AM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 2,563
joined: 2-24-2007
ozoneocean
usedbooks
And apparently not Windows 7
It does, it just takes patience... Right clicking it and setting a compatibility mode or something, I can't recall, but it does.

Ah. Good to know. I was just told that by someone else. I've never even seen Windows 7. :)
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:38PM
Splash Damage at 10:27AM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 178
joined: 3-27-2009
Metruis
Splash Damage
my worst criticism is no criticism. How can I get better if there is no criticism? And then when I ask for straight up hardcore super evil criticism, people can't think of anything. WTF?

and I HATE 5's. Stop giving us perfect ratings. Of course, I do it too... It's kind of just expected now.

Well, that's because by DD standards, your art's good. As said--to get real criticism you sort of have to drag yourself out of the community here. Fortunately I'm not really part of this community... because people can't really think of anything? Really? Pff. I can think of things that could be done better in the 'big name' comics!

You really want critique? Airbrush shading for your style of lineart is just killing it. Study color theory. Or even just google reference pictures for color ideas. Don't shade with black/transparent. Shade with color. Shadows always have blue in them. If you're looking for speed, I suggest the 'slightly darker version of the color underneath, set layer to multiply' trick--obviously you have a Photoshop/varient. Center your text in your speech bubbles instead of--it looks like you're writing each line seperate? They look uneven. You know you can hit enter on a line, right? Shape your bubbles for the text instead of just putting text in an oval. Typopgraphy would push your comic to the next level, as well as less quick "I used black and pressure sensitivity set to opacity fuzzy brush" shading. Also, highlights. Use them sparingly. Your art will jump off the page. There's purple highlights in your most recent update. Do more of that sort of stuff, builds atmosphere. You have a neat art style, I really like the look of your characters... it's different than most of what I see online these days and would love to see more of it. Keep pushing it instead of falling into a Penny Arcade or manga or something trap... I like the originality of it.



THANK YOU
drunkduck.com/splash_damage
Updating Again.
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:54PM
harkovast at 12:04PM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 5,197
joined: 10-12-2008
You know how we have a "Say something constructive about the comic about you" and "comment on the comic above you" sections?

Am I the only person that would like to see a "Insult the comic about you as harshly as you can" thread?
After all, it wouldn't be unpleasent since you would only get insulted if you chose to insult someone else. Its like karma. If everyone is nice then no one would post on it...but some people wouldn't be able to help themselves!

Okay, I know the moderators would never allow it, but it IS a funny idea

For more Harkovast related goings on, go to the Harkovast Forum
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:44PM
Kroatz at 1:52PM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 2,264
joined: 8-18-2008
Just make it!
I'd love that thread, I'd just continuously burn my own comic. 8 pages an hour!
Project-sand.com
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:23PM
ozoneocean at 4:57PM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 24,397
joined: 1-2-2006
harkovast
You know how we have a "Say something constructive about the comic about you" and "comment on the comic above you" sections?

Am I the only person that would like to see a "Insult the comic about you as harshly as you can" thread?
After all, it wouldn't be unpleasent since you would only get insulted if you chose to insult someone else. Its like karma. If everyone is nice then no one would post on it...but some people wouldn't be able to help themselves!

Okay, I know the moderators would never allow it, but it IS a funny idea
We had that a few times in the past, but they died out. :(
 
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:36PM
JustNoPoint at 5:00PM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 1,280
joined: 3-16-2007
I couldn't get the alerter to work on Windows 7. Even when trying to run it in XP compatibility mode.

Read "The Devon Legacy".
A full color web comic updating daily on www.comicfury.com
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:12PM
ozoneocean at 7:24PM, March 7, 2010
(online)
posts: 24,397
joined: 1-2-2006
JustNoPoint
I couldn't get the alerter to work on Windows 7. Even when trying to run it in XP compatibility mode.
Well you're just not good enough! >:

----------
Yeah, anyway. Read that thread. Looks like she used a lot more of her own genius in there :)
 
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:36PM
CornTown at 7:57PM, March 13, 2010
(online)
posts: 37
joined: 2-1-2010
Some guy (or gal) sent me an e-mail saying that my comic was blasphemy and that I was going to go to hell for doing comics about the passion of Jesus.
last edited on July 14, 2011 11:46AM
harkovast at 3:48AM, March 14, 2010
(online)
posts: 5,197
joined: 10-12-2008
Corn Town I think you've got confused.
This place is for WORST criticism.

What you just described is the most awesome criticism I've ever heard a comic received!

If you want to read some BAD criticism, check out what they say about my comic on TVtropes-

TVtropes
•So Bad It's Horrible: From the incredibly static-looking action scenes, to the basic and monotonous plot, to the poor art quality, to the walls of text slowing the pace to a crawl, many find it difficult to read without wincing or cackling with delight. As always, Your Mileage May Vary.


Ow, my pride!

For more Harkovast related goings on, go to the Harkovast Forum
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:44PM
patrickdevine at 7:18PM, March 14, 2010
(online)
posts: 759
joined: 4-26-2007
harkovast
If you want to read some BAD criticism, check out what they say about my comic on TVtropes-

TVtropes
•So Bad It's Horrible: From the incredibly static-looking action scenes, to the basic and monotonous plot, to the poor art quality, to the walls of text slowing the pace to a crawl, many find it difficult to read without wincing or cackling with delight. As always, Your Mileage May Vary.


Ow, my pride!


Aw, man! I'm actually really impressed! Hopefully one day I'll have haters at least half as awesome as yours!
http://www.iprc.org [iprc.org]
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:41PM
ozoneocean at 8:38PM, March 14, 2010
(online)
posts: 24,397
joined: 1-2-2006
lol!


OK, let's be webcomic "critics" shall we? :)

"OMFG!!!!! Ffffffffuuuu! Jebus motherloving anal-rimming christ!!!! Oh DARE those C**TS spend their free time to work on and produce 100% free comics for me to look at????!!!! HOW DARE THEY??? OMFBCLG!!!! AAAARRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHH!!!!! YOUR COMIC SUCKS AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD!!!"

----------
In reality the "criticism" and the reading of it is just another form of entertainment, like the production and reading the comics themselves, except it requires less effort and is dependent on the comics for its existence. Without the comics those people are back to talking about which celeb is currently flashing their shaved pudenda.
 
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:36PM
Orin J Master at 12:09PM, March 15, 2010
(online)
posts: 437
joined: 12-16-2007
ozoneocean
lol!


OK, let's be webcomic "critics" shall we? :)

"OMFG!!!!! Ffffffffuuuu! Jebus motherloving anal-rimming christ!!!! Oh DARE those C**TS spend their free time to work on and produce 100% free comics for me to look at????!!!! HOW DARE THEY??? OMFBCLG!!!! AAAARRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHH!!!!! YOUR COMIC SUCKS AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD!!!"


that's the correct response to pretty much any sprite comic, though. i don't see how so many people can recycle the exact same plotline and sprites from pocket monsters and then entirely fail to realize they have nothing new to add to it for so long.
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:22PM
ozoneocean at 12:11AM, March 16, 2010
(online)
posts: 24,397
joined: 1-2-2006
Orin J Master
that's the correct response to pretty much any sprite comic, though. i don't see how so many people can recycle the exact same plotline and sprites from pocket monsters and then entirely fail to realize they have nothing new to add to it for so long.
In the case of most those... I'd rather be looking at celeb pudenda. Shaved or otherwise. :)
 
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:36PM
Peipei at 8:58PM, March 16, 2010
(online)
posts: 449
joined: 7-18-2006
I haven't gotten too much hateful feedback on either of my comics. It's mostly a bit of constructive criticism every once in a while, which is fine. However, I do recall receiving a comment on DeadFingers one time about a district's disciplinary system. Something about it being too tame, what's that supposed to mean xD? I'll have to dig through the archive to find that comment again.

The way I see it, if someone is deeply offended or hateful of ones' comic(s), they can simply click the little red 'X' on the upper right corner of the browser if it bugs them so much :p
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:41PM
harkovast at 12:17PM, March 17, 2010
(online)
posts: 5,197
joined: 10-12-2008
Don't worry, Ozone.
they may not have liked my comic, but they still posted a link to it when they typed that.
So out of me and them, one of us is getting additional hits, and it aint them.

For more Harkovast related goings on, go to the Harkovast Forum
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:44PM
Kroatz at 1:55PM, March 18, 2010
(online)
posts: 2,264
joined: 8-18-2008
I just got some critique at school, I was in my class, with one of my classmates. I had just told him about DrunkDuck and he decided to check it out. While he was checking some of the comics that were on the homepage at the time I updated on my lappy. Suddenly I hear him laughing and then he started to poke me, I checked out what he was looking at and it was my new No Heroes page. I had not told him my username or my comics name but I had shown him some sketches of my pages. He didn't know that it was made by me so he said (translation):

'This guy totally ripped you off, that dog looks exactly like the one you made. only the colors are way worse then what you did. How can you rip someone off and still suck?'

I just laughed for about an hour.
yeah, that was fun.
Project-sand.com
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:23PM
Air Raid Robertson at 8:28AM, March 19, 2010
(online)
posts: 292
joined: 5-7-2009
I got some crap over my comics while I was in high school as well. Some school official got their hands on one and decided that I was a suicidal malcontent who may wind up plotting a school shooting. I was suspended until I underwent a psychiatric evaluation.

The comic I did back then was in the same wavelength as Air Raid Robertson. (Albeit much more crudely drawn) So, naturally, I thought that the whole thing was ridiculous. My friends and I got a good laugh out of it though, and my comic became much more popular among my fellow students as a direct result of the controversy.

...

One guy read Air Raid Robertson itself and absolutely hated it. His main issue was with the "Island of Misfit Supervillains" story. He actually found out where I worked somehow and came in to give me shit over it. Things got heated and he threw a glass bottle at my head.

Fortunately, his aim was as misguided as his anger. He fled almost immediately afterwards as well.

Considering the subject matter of that story I expected it to piss a few people off. Still, I certainly didn't expect that sort of thing.
last edited on July 14, 2011 10:48AM
kyupol at 5:19PM, March 22, 2010
(online)
posts: 3,710
joined: 1-12-2006
Now I'm having a heated debate with a Christian extremist.

As far as he's concerned:
- The Earth is only 5000 years old and that evolution theory and "aliens seeded us" theory is part of the conspiracy of Satan and the Illuminati.

- Aliens do not exist. Earth is the only planet in the universe with life. UFOs and aliens are really the fallen angels masquerading as our space brothers. The real conspiracy is that the demons are gonna put up a massive show with some posing as good aliens and some posing as reptoids. Then when all the fireworks are over, there will be this Luciferian New World Order.

- Psychic abilities, hypnosis, NLP (neuro-linguistic-programming), psychology and psychiatry ... are all the creation of the fallen angels and are evil in itself.

- The bible (King James version) is the one and only truth and all other religions (Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, atheism, etc.) are the creation of the fallen angels. ANYONE who doesnt accept Jesus as God and the one and only savior is doomed to eternal hellfire and brimstone.

- ALL Churches that claim to be Christian are false. Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, 7th Day Adventist, Episcopalian, Pentecostal, Evangelical, etc... all secretly work for Lucifer.

- Chakra centers, chi, etc. are part of the lies fed to you... but the reality is that demons are possessing you without your knowledge.

- "Philosophy" and "free thought" is Satanic.


Watch. Sooner or later, I will be accused of being a secret agent working for:
- Israel
- The Vatican
- CIA
- Mossad
- MI-5 / MI-6
- ISI
- NSA
- Department of Homeland Security
- The Jesuits
- Opus Dei
- The Freemasons
- The Theosophists
- The Communists
- The Nazis
- The Reptilians

... or simply directly answerable to Lucifer himself. lol!
NOW UPDATING!!!
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:27PM
usedbooks at 5:23PM, March 22, 2010
(online)
posts: 2,563
joined: 2-24-2007
The Vatican = The Reptilians

Or at least the Space Vatican... headed by the space pope.
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:38PM
Ryuthehedgewolf at 3:46AM, March 23, 2010
(online)
posts: 1,340
joined: 9-2-2007
I don't exactly recall if some of this was criticism, I know that some of it was, but here are some things that bother me particularly about my art. Something I'm planning on really working on.

-Some of the poses look really awkward for my characters, due to my rather crappy anatomy.

-The backgrounds aren't all that detailed, and rather boring looking, very bland.

-When I do shadowing with heavy blacks, I don't seem to do it in the right spot.

-I tend not to draw many other views besides the side view, frontal view, and occasionally worm's eye. I really need to work on this.

I plan on fixing all this really soon, because it's getting to that point where my art is REALLY starting to bother me. And I need to stop being so lazy.
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:16PM
GracehFaceh at 6:34PM, March 23, 2010
(online)
posts: 433
joined: 10-2-2008
kyupol
Watch. Sooner or later, I will be accused of being a secret agent working for:

- Opus Dei

... or simply directly answerable to Lucifer himself. lol!


SECRET AGENT, WHAT LOL. My dad belongs to Opus Dei and according to him, they basically sit around, talk about how awesome being Catholic is and make corny jokes for like an hour on Wednesdays. They can't afford spies, only the cool religions do that. :'[

Though it would explain the rippling portal to hell in my living room. It's hard to match that shit with the curtains.

Ryuthehedgewolf
-I tend not to draw many other views besides the side view, frontal view, and occasionally worm's eye. I really need to work on this.


Yo, sammmee. I love a slight angle view, facing right and abuse it like whoa.
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:38PM
patrickdevine at 7:39PM, March 23, 2010
(online)
posts: 759
joined: 4-26-2007
usedbooks
The Vatican = The Reptilians

Or at least the Space Vatican... headed by the space pope.


http://www.iprc.org [iprc.org]
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:41PM
GameCargo at 12:14PM, March 25, 2010
(online)
posts: 38
joined: 1-8-2010
The worst criticism I've gotten by a few people would be my art and pacing. The pacing part I don't get because I've been told I'm excellent at storytelling but I guess they're separate. Other than that, the only concerns I've gotten was the fact that I don't act like I'm stepping on egg shells when I'm covering topics like rape, incest, or religion.

All in all, criticism helps...not the troll criticism though which surprisingly I don't get that any more.
Going through motions while I get my head straight.
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:32PM
DrLuck at 12:06PM, April 18, 2010
(online)
posts: 134
joined: 1-4-2009
I'm usually very welcoming to criticism, both good and bad. One, though, stood out to me. My grandma was looking through my art and pointed at Lynch (for reference, this is him http://zibaricon.org/comics/characters/lynch.html [zibaricon.org] ) and said "He looks like Micheal Jackson." I was all "Jee, thanks, grandma."

In retrospect, I can see the connection a bit (especially the pale skin) and the image of Lynch dancing to Smooth Criminal makes me happy.

Thanks, grandma.
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:17PM
alwinbot at 6:14PM, April 19, 2010
(online)
posts: 884
joined: 1-12-2010
The worst criticism about my comic, I ever got was...


OH WAIT, I DON'T GET COMMENTS ON MY WEBCOMIC. HOHOHOHO!
Read this comic. It is the greatest journal comic ever written and drawn. Trust me.
last edited on July 14, 2011 10:50AM
machinehead at 8:11AM, April 25, 2010
(online)
posts: 318
joined: 10-30-2008
My comics have been criticized by a lot of people, mostly on my facebook page by people I know or know my wife. The most recent critique called my comic: "insensitive and crass." Personally I found it complementing, I guess it's all how you look at it.
[..] [..]
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:49PM
korosu at 9:02AM, April 26, 2010
(online)
posts: 1,063
joined: 1-28-2006
I've been fortunate enough to not get much criticism on Faust. (Although, is that really a good thing? Does it really do an artist any favors when all you're doing is farting rainbows over their comic?) Chimera, my old comic, on the other hand, has received a fair share of criticisms. For the most part I would occasionally get the usual gripe about it being anime cliched or whatever. (Which, hey, it is; I was young. Most of the comic is just a piece of crap. :P) I also had this one guy comment randomly, "Doesn't anybody here know how to draw hands?" I didn't think my hands looked all that bad, but anyway.
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:21PM
Dark Pascual at 9:43AM, April 26, 2010
(online)
posts: 498
joined: 1-5-2009
usedbooks
The Vatican = The Reptilians

Or at least the Space Vatican... headed by the space pope.


Well... the meetings ARE kinda cool...



Now, with the subject.

In my opinion, things like "Yer komik suks, u maggot" are not criticism, that's bashing.

Things like "your comic is crude and childish", that is not a criticism, that's a personal comment (as valid as it can be).

To me, criticism is point out a work's objective fails despite personal tastes, and provide advices about how improve.

A comic being "crude" is not an objective fail, it may be an stylish choice, and that that isn't enough to be a bad comic. And the bashing, while fun, isn't really helpful.

Luckily, I do get criticism from time to time about effects, layout and lighting, among other things. The last one that I got was about make a little bit more bright my night images so details and situations can be appreciated better. THAT is criticism.

Because, IMO, the criticism should be helpful to the artist, because it points where to improve.
[..]
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:07PM
deepcheese at 8:12PM, May 21, 2010
(online)
posts: 295
joined: 9-3-2006
Oh! I got a pretty good one from back when I was working on After Lily!
It's SUPER LONG!!!


I blindly got my copy of After Lily Book 1 at YuleCon 2009. I figured, it was cheap enough, and I was supporting a smalltime, independent artist. Now I wish my support had went elsewhere, because to be frank, this manga sucks.

Let's start with the book itself. While the cover is glossy and sharp, and the pages within are of expected quality, the print quality inside looks like the output of a dot matrix printer I had in the early 90s. The inside pages are blurry, and even bold text has a fuzziness to it. Looking closer, you can see distinct ringing around bold lines and text - that's right, these pages were submitted to the publisher as overly-compressed JPEGs and then printed. It looks ugly, and greatly cheapens the presentation of this book as a physical product. I could almost overlook this if the book was printed with a higher ink density, but the cheap print quality amplifies the effect. The compressed images and poor print quality combine to produce an overall blurry image. Perhaps if this were produced as a regular-sized manga and not a "fullsize" picture book, these faults would be less noticeable, but I believe that anyone expects this manga's print quality to make the large pages worthwhile will be disappointed.

To discuss the print further, Ms. Scott could have made use of a good proofreader. I've encountered several mistakes that degrade this book's quality. First of all, there's a multitude of missing commas. While I at first thought it was a style element (the summary on the back page lacks punctuation, save for a period), reading the manga itself shows that she just plain forgot them in many places. It looks sloppy, and creates distracting run-on sentences. If you try to read along with the characters' voices imagined in your head, half of what they say will end up sounding similar to Ron Burgundy's stray question mark from the movie "Anchorman." There's several other missing and misused punctuation marks too. The way she uses hyphens for non-interjectory sentences is rather jarring; she instead uses them to show that a sentence continues from one speech bubble to another, and it looks amateurish and unskilled. There are several missing end punctuation marks as well, and that's just plain sloppy. Additionally, a lot of the text isn't centered properly in speech/thought bubbles, which looks very lazy, and makes the book feel like a cheap and unskilled product. Finally, the worst part is that there are many misspelled words that reflect the amateur quality of this work. "Boreing", "catterpillars", "compleatly", "untill", "righ", and the like are scattered throughout the entire book. A few of these are even on the same page where the word was spelled correctly, showing that Ms. Scott didn't even reread her work (or at least enough to notice a word spelled differently throughout a page).

With the objective nature of the book covered, let's get subjective. A good manga should have cool characters, good artwork, funny dialogue, interesting ideas, maybe some kickass action scenes... traditionally, comic books give authors a fast-paced way to tell a story, and involve the reader with the characters on a personal level. But, we can't all be Stan Lee.

The characters presented in this story are cookie-cutter, and lack depth. We start off with Kai, the angry janitor of the afterlife. He's definitely not happy with his job, thinks the afterlife itself is "miserable", and isn't afraid to run his mouth and take on a peeved expression. Welcome to Emoville, population Kai. There's really not much else to say about him; he gets roped into becoming Lily's assistant, and just stands around bewildered at the events that unfold. We could perhaps have a more bit of insight into why Kai is so peeved, other than that his job is too easy... maybe he has unfinished business in the living world, or had a traumatic experience with a mop as a young child (he REALLY hates washing these floors)? Nope, he's just a big ball of misery that has a problem with everything. Next we are introduced to Lily. She's happy with being dead, and a bit of an airhead, much to Kai's annoyance. Turns out she has a mysterious job of collecting dead souls from the living world, and gets so into her job that she talks very seriously and monotonously, and gets empty eyes. I guess Lily's supposed to have some sort of deep side to her, but this just ends up looking cliche. How many times have we seen an anime or manga character get possessed or experience a temporary change in personality, and talk differently with empty eyes? Well, here's one more. Other than our two main characters, we have the lost soul, some unnamed young lady, haunted by an unpleasant past, who tried to take solace in the concept of growing wings ala butterflies. In a confusing and abrupt sequence, she winds up dead, with some actual butterfly-woman encouraging her to pursue her dreams of becoming a butterfly.

Now let's get to the nitty-gritty of the story. We meet the two characters in Chapter 1, and man oh man is Kai pissed. Lily can't even seem to remember to take off her shoes! Wait, what's this... this little airhead is actually in some crazy position of importance that sort of breaks the rules of the dead? Anyway, Chapter 2 is spent (more like wasted) on the exposition of this one-off(?) butterfly woman. This part's hard to follow. For whatever reason, lost soul lady decides she wants to be a butterfly, some lady makes fun of her (We later (indirectly) find out it's her mom), she dies, she remembers her past of people being mean to her (we're never told why, maybe we could empathize if we knew the reason...), and the actual butterfly-woman I mentioned before beckons her to eat butterflies. In the final chapter of this book, Chapter 3 returns to Lily. As a collector of lost souls, Lily's current task is to correct this no-good soul's misdeed of eating a live cocoon, and take her to the afterlife. Lily stabs butterfly-soul-lady, thereby freeing the butterfly's soul (at least, I think that's what happens... Lily "kills the butterfly" to stop "their souls from merging" which would be "bad"), she stops being so emo, and she agrees to follow Lily and Kai to the afterlife.

There's really very little else to the above. There's only a few lines of dialogue on each page, leaving little room for anything more than short explanations of the scene at hand. This doesn't do the comic much good; as I said above, I got confused during several parts where either the reasoning behind characters' actions, or the actual actions of an event, aren't explained. This could be excusable during a later volume of the book, but for the first few opening chapters, we need our hands held for a bit, especially since it deals with a world not of our own, with its own rules to follow and the like.

Not only does the progression of the story itself leave a lot to be desired, the story itself has very little to like. It's going for a dark-quirky atmosphere, by treating death as familiar, and having an ill-suited young woman handling very dark tasks, but the story is amateurish, and honestly not very imaginative. Every conflict is quickly (and linearly) resolved, and Lily seems to know her way around the rules of death so well that nothing could ever get in the way of her job. Where's the fun in that? The dialogue is barebones and unentertaining, and gives little insight into the characters speaking said dialogue. There's no humor or wit, and despite having a mismatched duo of characters, they seem to have little dynamic between them

Finally, the art style. Could this be this manga's saving grace? Hell naw! From the first page of Chapter 1, we're presented with unlikeable and unskilled art. Here we see Kai standing in front of a pixelly brick wall, making a lopsided, wide-eyed face at his seemingly-2D mop. This does a good job of setting the tone for the rest of the manga. Throughout the rest of the comic, we see many errors in perspective, inconsistent use of shading, unexplained variations in line width, jagged lines, pixellation, and bad anatomy. Most of the scenes convey little energy or movement, and looks like lifeless cutouts. Even the aforementioned stabbing isn't actually shown, but the cliched shortcut of "closeup of a character's face beforehand, aftershot of the damage" is used instead. Whether this is a style element or trying to mask a lack of skill in conveying skillful movement is unknown..

Use the "search inside this book" feature to glimpse at a few pages and you'll see just how amateurish this is. To me, there's way worse pages that represent Ms. Scott's lack of skill (and perhaps even patience), but even looking at those few pages, would you be happy having a large manga showing such bad artwork, among your other manga with great imagery? Well, I'm not happy.


Seriously.. that has got to be... almost an entire page.
It's not like I got mad or offended or anything because a) Alot of the criticism was valid. and b) they bought a book, so they have a right to complain about not getting their moneys worth. But still.... it's just so long! The sheer size of it is almost baffling, really
last edited on July 14, 2011 12:10PM
Pandafilando at 10:12AM, May 22, 2010
(online)
posts: 129
joined: 8-30-2008
I don't understand your comic!
Okay, so there's this new manga-style comic on Drunk Duck called Transcerebral. I can't tell you what it's about, exactly, because the story moves along like molasses hardly serves us with the courtesy of even telling a story. It's been a long time since I've ranted about another comic. Not many comics have really gone so far as to actually offend me since the days when Sonic and Mega Man were the subject of nearly half the comics on the internet. ...Oh wait, that's still kind of the case. Nevertheless, I've been able to withhold my rage on this subject for some time. ...That is until I read Transcerebral.

And what's worse is that this comic is getting almost universal praise. Even worse than that, it got praise from ME before I realized that this author doesn't know how to structure her comic at all. I feel like I'm part responsible for this comic now having the top spot on the Drunk Duck popular comics list.

Now I realize the irony of criticizing another comic for being slow, when mine's been stalled for over a month. However, mine doesn't take two months for the lead character to get out of bed. And yes, it's been two months, and the lead character has just now gotten out of bed in Transcerebral. And now she's dealing with the maid, who is trying to serve her breakfast, an act which bemuses the lead character for reasons I can't even begin to understand.

Seriously, what the fuck is going on? Let's read the comic's listing description to find out...

"Ronald Neumann is a young but virtuous brain-computer interface researcher gone missing. Andrea Welles is a girl that has recently recovered from a long time coma. What connections do they share with each other??."

Okay, so I assume that the girl waking up is actually this Ronald fellow who is now trapped in this girl Andrea's body, for some reason. And of course, he goes through the typical "hilarious" panic/joy of discovering that he's in the body of a girl, something which was accomplished much better in Shining Generation Valkyrie Yuuki.

Let me just reiterate here that it's the PACE of this comic that drives me nuts. She keeps making these pages in which one very small thing happens. It's like, "Oh no, I'm a girl!", "Oh no, I don't know who I am!", "Oh no! There's someone opening the door!", "Oh no! It's the maid!", "Oh no! She's saying things I don't understand!", and "Oh no! Here's a flashback that has no context." Seriously, I want to shake the person who draws this and say, "GET TO THE POINT!"

Today, I just couldn't take it anymore and gave this comic probably the first negative comment it's ever received, because everyone else is too nice to do otherwise. I told her that the comic is too slow and that she could easily structure each page so as to cover a lot more ground than the snail's pace she's been going on since the comic started.

You can see that comment rightchere.

And again, I betray my own purpose, because I had to be nice and give her a neutral score of "3". I should have given her a "1". I should have also said, "Learn to draw hands, stop copying manga, and have someone proofread your comic."

very first criticism i got, now some of his points are completely accurate and i've tried to fix them over the time, but this critic was posted in this person's blog even tough he used to comment positively in my comic page.

i also find it kind of funny that he compares my comic with one long established comic whose author he seems to have befriended.
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:38PM

Forgot Password
©2011-2012 WOWIO, Inc. All Rights ReservedAdvertisement