Media Megaforum
The Bourne Ultimatum
subcultured
at 9:26PM, April 3, 2007
(online)
posts: 5,392
joined: 1-7-2006
yes, please
J
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:02PM
reconjsh
at 9:31AM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 663
joined: 12-18-2006
I loved the first one and the second one was damn good too. I very much want to see the Bourne story more.
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:02PM
kingofsnake
at 10:25AM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 1,374
joined: 9-27-2006
[capcomics.net]
[capcomics.net]
[capcomics.net]
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:16PM
subcultured
at 11:16AM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 5,392
joined: 1-7-2006
bourne is better than any james bond!
he RAWWWKS!
he RAWWWKS!
J
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:02PM
ozoneocean
at 1:41PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 24,387
joined: 1-2-2006
No way. Bond is a man of style, as well as ability. Bourne is just stunts and effects... Plus, he's played by the monkey faced Matt Damon.
I personally preferred the original theatrical adaption with Bourne played by Richard Chamberlain. Without the stupid stunts it just looked so much more real, the story was nice and solid too.
...Although while Damon looks like the missing link between man and beast, Chamberlain looks like someone who got carried away with plastic surgery! :)
I personally preferred the original theatrical adaption with Bourne played by Richard Chamberlain. Without the stupid stunts it just looked so much more real, the story was nice and solid too.
...Although while Damon looks like the missing link between man and beast, Chamberlain looks like someone who got carried away with plastic surgery! :)
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:26PM
subcultured
at 1:50PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 5,392
joined: 1-7-2006
bond is just corny compared to bourne.
bourne has more story and makes me care for the characters. bond just has a lot of throwaway chracters, even bond himself.
bond is more superficial than bourne. bourne actually gets hurt and thinks for the moment. he doesn't need some gimmicks to get him out of situations.
cases in point when he wanted to blow up the house he looks at his surrounding and broke a gas pipe, put a magazine on a toaster as a timer then BOOOOOOM!
bond would die in a sec without his utilities. This does not include the new bond, since they copied the style of BOURNE of bieng more realistic
bourne has more story and makes me care for the characters. bond just has a lot of throwaway chracters, even bond himself.
bond is more superficial than bourne. bourne actually gets hurt and thinks for the moment. he doesn't need some gimmicks to get him out of situations.
cases in point when he wanted to blow up the house he looks at his surrounding and broke a gas pipe, put a magazine on a toaster as a timer then BOOOOOOM!
bond would die in a sec without his utilities. This does not include the new bond, since they copied the style of BOURNE of bieng more realistic
J
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:02PM
SpANG
at 2:03PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 3,105
joined: 1-1-2006
subcultured
...This does not include the new bond, since they copied the style of BOURNE of bieng more realistic
Which ic exactly what I hated about that movie. Bond SHOULD be 'cheeky' humor. That's what makes it great! This is not to be confused with 'campy' or 'corny' however (which Roger Moore had- in spades!).
Matt Damon will never hold a candle to Connery. ;)
And lets not forget that it's the Bourne francise that derived from Bond!
"To a rational mind, nothing is inexplicable. Only unexplained."
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:52PM
kingofsnake
at 2:28PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 1,374
joined: 9-27-2006
The new bond movie had the same tone as the books. The old bond movies were their own animal.
If it makes you feel better don't think of the current bond as part of the old bond franchise. Think of him as a completely new adaptation of the books, totally unrelated in any way to any of the other movies.
Oh and go read the original Ian Flemming books, they're friggen awesome
If it makes you feel better don't think of the current bond as part of the old bond franchise. Think of him as a completely new adaptation of the books, totally unrelated in any way to any of the other movies.
Oh and go read the original Ian Flemming books, they're friggen awesome
[capcomics.net] [capcomics.net] [capcomics.net]
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:16PM
lafhaha
at 2:56PM, April 4, 2007
(offline)
posts: 20
joined: 3-18-2007
Woohooooo!!!! I can't wait!!! I loved the first two!
last edited on July 14, 2011 1:27PM
subcultured
at 7:46PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 5,392
joined: 1-7-2006
my tastes run a lil different from yours then..i like movies that makes me WANT to be that character. and bourne makes me want to be him cause he's more realistic.
J
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:02PM
Priceman
at 8:22PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 521
joined: 11-2-2006
Looks sweet, the Bourne series rocks. Basically, it should breakdown like this:
Bourne is a kickass, living ghost that make snap decisions, fight, and disappear from the eyes of the government.
Bond is.....well, a pimp with cool cars and hot women.
......
........
Damn, this sounded easier before I typed it out.
Bourne is a kickass, living ghost that make snap decisions, fight, and disappear from the eyes of the government.
Bond is.....well, a pimp with cool cars and hot women.
......
........
Damn, this sounded easier before I typed it out.
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:47PM
ozoneocean
at 8:58PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 24,387
joined: 1-2-2006
Yup, he's a pimp ^^
Nah, Bond is way better. Not when he's got the stupid gadgets though, or does those silly stunts: in the early Bonds when it's mostly about skill, charm and guile. Bond is best as a player and an operator.
Flemming eh? How many have read the Ludlam's Bourne books?
Nah, Bond is way better. Not when he's got the stupid gadgets though, or does those silly stunts: in the early Bonds when it's mostly about skill, charm and guile. Bond is best as a player and an operator.
Flemming eh? How many have read the Ludlam's Bourne books?
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:26PM
subcultured
at 8:59PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 5,392
joined: 1-7-2006
i'm talking about the movies not the books
the book is most of the time different from the movies
the book is most of the time different from the movies
J
last edited on July 14, 2011 4:02PM
ozoneocean
at 9:07PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 24,387
joined: 1-2-2006
subculturedReconjsh wasn't though ;)
i'm talking about the movies not the books
That's who I was replying to there Sub :)
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:26PM
reconjsh
at 10:32PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 663
joined: 12-18-2006
ozoneoceansubculturedReconjsh wasn't though ;)
i'm talking about the movies not the books
That's who I was replying to there Sub :)
Huh?
I was talking about the movie. I know I used the word "story" but I meant it as in "Bourne's storyline". Sorry for the confusion.
And why are people talking about Connery as Bond? Everyone knows Roger Moore was the best Bond. *sheesh*
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:02PM
Priceman
at 10:45PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 521
joined: 11-2-2006
subcultured
i'm talking about the movies not the books
the book is most of the time different from the movies
There are James Bond books? Why wasn't I informed of this??!!
last edited on July 14, 2011 2:47PM
reconjsh
at 10:54PM, April 4, 2007
(online)
posts: 663
joined: 12-18-2006
Pricemansubcultured
i'm talking about the movies not the books
the book is most of the time different from the movies
There are James Bond books? Why wasn't I informed of this??!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Bond#Books [en.wikipedia.org]
Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_22 [en.wikipedia.org] - new bond film.
last edited on July 14, 2011 3:02PM
Crazy Dutchman
at 2:19AM, April 5, 2007
(offline)
posts: 558
joined: 2-6-2006
The first movie was just suprisingly good, the sequel was awsome too.. I'm reallt looking forward to that third one :)
So Bored (Zo verveeld)
Cold Vision *Hiatus*
Cold Vision *Hiatus*
last edited on July 14, 2011 11:48AM
©2011-2012 WOWIO, Inc. All Rights Reserved
