Login:
 


Tag this comic/View this comic's tags! Digg this comic! Make this comic Del.icio.us! Reddit this comic! Add this comic to Ma.gnolia! E-mail this comic to a friend!




 

Comments


kaleygeminni

Send a private quack!
NO, Kaley wasn't a stalker and Lester didn't have sex with Hyo more than once. Hyo's just seeing a similarity between the two occasions. Poor Hyo...
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009


User: Darius Drake 5

Send a private quack!
Wow, young Kayley was cute. Not that I expected differently, but I wasn't expecting to ever see her young self in full colour on her own.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: G D 5

Send a private quack!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Aleks55 5

Send a private quack!
poor guy, rejected by both genders
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: I Am The 1337 Master 5

Send a private quack!
D:...EW.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: leaving_a_comment 5

Send a private quack!
@ everyone You can't divide by 0, you are not God.
2+2=fish everyone knows that.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Adrian 5

Send a private quack!
Nice one..
Why do these guys look so feminin in your commic?
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Miki 5

Send a private quack!
All this talk about sex...I miss Moogi!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Zephyrion 5

Send a private quack!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Taku 5

Send a private quack!
And lots of Sex... with Moogi of course.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Aba Caxias 5

Send a private quack!
Poor Hyo, nobody wants him T.T
except for Moogi... but she's a slut too =P
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: bwilliy9 5

Send a private quack!
Daww....all he wants is love...:33
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: kananeona

Send a private quack!
poor hyo, hes such a doll. and omg lester has some sense after all!!! epiphany time!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin

Send a private quack!
I hope Kaleygeminni deletes all this shit ^^
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin

Send a private quack!
sorry, it was replacement a²-ab+b² by (a-b)²
it is still wromg and the source for the silly result.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin

Send a private quack!
@Bruener300
the error in your first math riddle is that you replace a²-b² by (a-b)²
That's wrong
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin

Send a private quack!
@Bruenor300
You expanded the term to
x^2-y^2 = xy-y^2
but since x=y, you can replace it to
x^2-x^2 = x^2-x^2
x^2-x^2 = 0
so there is
0 = 0
Since you operate with an asymmetric formula and divide by 0, the result can be anything.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin

Send a private quack!
@Bruenor300

(x-y) = 0
So you divided through zero.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: DarkNekoLily 5

Send a private quack!
hugs hyo- have him commet to lester there cutes togethers
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Harmonious D 5

Send a private quack!
And then he fell off the cliff
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: houseofmuses 5

Send a private quack!
Heh. Inevitably, ONE or the other wants to settle down.... :)
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Bruenor300

Send a private quack!
Here's a better 2+2=5 proof and this one you can actually follow.

2+2 = 2+2+0

correct? right.

Now according to Robins Lemma proof
Let x be a non-zero number, and set y=x. Thus:


x = y
x^2 = xy
x^2-y^2 = xy-y^2
(x+y)(x-y) = y(x-y)
x+y = y
2y = y
2 = 1
1 = 0

Now since 2+2 = 2+2+0 and we apply the lemma proof so that 0 = 1, 2+2+0 = 2+2+1 =5

THEREFORE
2+2 = 5

*CHALLENGE* Find the "fuzzy math" in that
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Squirrel Master 5

Send a private quack!
Err, bru, you have an = inside a pair of () - that's not right, for a start. I think some of your numbers are supposed to be indices for exponentials, but I can't tell, and your - seems to have disappeared from both sides. I can't tell you if it's right or wrong because I can't even follow it.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: kaleygeminni

Send a private quack!
Thanks for the comments guys! This weekend, I will be at the AnimeUSA 2009 convention! ^^ I will get on the internet once in the while, but please your message after the beep. *beeeeeep*
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: DJLink 5

Send a private quack!
That seems to happen to us guys way too often...the lessening of sex not the Yaoi moments XD!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: benjin 5

Send a private quack!
Hyo is slutty? I missed that!
*fast scroll back*
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Bruenor300 5

Send a private quack!
Huh...Maybe he will put 2+2 together and maybe get 5. Wait...No, I have proof!

Start with: -20 = -20
Which is the same as: 16-36 = 25-45
Which can also be expressed as: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5
Add 81/4 to both sides: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) + 81/4 = 52) 9 X 5 + 81/4
Rearrange the terms: ({2+2}) 9/2) 2 = (5-9/2) 2
Ergo: 2+2 - 9/2 = 5
Hence: 2 + 2 = 5

See... simple, isn't it?

((I got that from a website, so I cannot verify it's Authenticity, whatsoever.))
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Monstro 5

Send a private quack!
Maybe Hyo should invest his time in other sluts who aren't going to find commitment soon?

:( poor guy, lackin' in booty calls
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Simpan 5

Send a private quack!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: DracheLehre 5

Send a private quack!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Orin J Master 5

Send a private quack!
they're both kinda messed up, really.

wait, i may not get to talk on this. lemme consult my crazyman guidebook.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: heartfang

Send a private quack!
wow kaley was even more hot back then...
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: ghostrunner 5

Send a private quack!
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009

User: Demochalatte 5

Send a private quack!
I think Hyo might need to tame down his slut ways and try a relationship. This could be a cute couple.
-Posted on Nov 20, 2009




Only registered members may vote. Sign up here!

 

browse | news | forums | store | my controls | logout

About Us | Contact | Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2006. Platinum Studios, Inc. All Rights Reserved.