| | Gibson Twist | | Welcome to Cheap Shots, guaranteed to be updated every two days for at least 3 months. The first handful of these were done several years ago, but the rest have been done more recently. You'll probably be able to tell when the transition happens. As for what it's about...you'll probably be able to figure that out on your own, which is good, because I still haven't. -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 |
| User: Gibson Twist | | | | Wow, good eye...this comic has been read by literally hundreds of eyes over the years and no one, myself included, has ever noticed that. Thanks. Hmm, where's my eraser? -Posted on Aug 17, 2007 | | User: joemeyer | | | Hate to point it out, but there's no "T" in Schulz.
But yeah, I miss Schulz too. -Posted on Aug 17, 2007 | | User: Nick | | 5 | -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: ToonmanAZ | | 5 | | Good stuff! -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: Eddygazilion | | 5 | Hey, more Cheap Shots!
Hooray! -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: Villamar | | 5 | | I like doonesbury, it grew on me, and I don't know when. It's the fungus of comics... -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: Gibson Twist | | | | Doonesbury is one of those rare gem comics that isn't meant to be haha funny, but is more of a serialized satire that sometimes happens to have a punchline. Like For Better or Worse, it makes a lot more sense when read in collected volumes. -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: dueeast | | 5 | | I find about 1 in 25 Doonesbury's to be funny. I get the humor, and DB's art style is interesting, but often that's not enough. I dig *this* comic so far! -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | | User: reidavidson | | 5 | | Doonesbury. I never understood Doonesbury. Not deep enough I guess. -Posted on Aug 16, 2007 | Only registered members may vote. Sign up here! | | |
